you're reading...
Word comparisons

Note 331 – Cringing at the use of they’re, there and their…


They’re, there and their are homophones, which means they are words which sound the same but are spelt differently. I don’t have a problem remembering which one to use (and tend to cringe when I see it written incorrectly); however, being a common spelling error, a work colleague asked me to add a post in My Writing Notebook for completeness. Please feel free to use this post as a learning tool, to share or just to cringe with me.

USING THE WORD THEY’RE

They’re is short for they are – so if you look at the first sentence below, you will see it is incorrect because you can replace there with they are. This makes the correct spelling they’re as shown in point two.

  1. If there coming with us, they had better get ready. (Incorrect)
  2. If they’re coming with us, they had better get ready. (Correct)

USING THE WORD THERE

According to the Oxford Dictionaries online, there are a few meanings of the word there. The main two are:

  • To indicate a place or position e.g. ‘over there‘ or ‘we stayed there for days’.
  • To indicate the fact or existence of something and used with the verb ‘be’ (there is, there are, there were, there was).

USING THE WORD THEIR

According to Oxford Dictionaries online, their is a possessive determiner. Here are two ways it can be used:

  1. To refer to something or someone mentioned previously in a sentence e.g. “Sharon and Mark have lived in their house for fifteen years”, or “we didn’t know our neighbour, but we’ve seen their dog outside”.
  2. To refer to a person or persons of an unidentified gender, e.g. “We heard some noise across the road where the children are playing; it could be their playtime”, or “She didn’t hear their name”.

USING ALL THREE WORDS IN A SENTENCE

Here are a couple of sentences with all three words in:

  1. They’re climbing over their fence to get over there.
  2. There are two sisters; each one has their own bedroom and they’re all very happy about it.

IF YOU NEED TO PRACTISE

Better-English.com has a game consisting of 20 sentences and you need to fill in the blank by selecting they’re, there or their.

My thoughts: although I said at the beginning of the post that I was fully aware of the differences, I still had to look things up to be able to explain it properly – especially the possessive pronoun part. So, I do feel that I learnt something today, even if it was just to learn how to structure things in a way that I could teach it.

Until tomorrow…

Sandra
www.sandramadeira.com

About these ads

About Sandra Madeira

I am a full-time working mum with a passion for writing and inspiring others. Please let me know what you think of my blog - constructive comments welcome. Have a great day Sandra Freelance Writer www.sandramadeira.com

Discussion

2 thoughts on “Note 331 – Cringing at the use of they’re, there and their…

  1. I’ve never really struggled with these 3….but my husband drives me insane. It doesn’t matter how many times I tell him the differences he always gets them confused, along with your & you’re lol

    Will show him your post hon…maybe you might be able to get through to him lol

    xx

    Posted by Vikki (The View Outside) | March 27, 2012, 7:46 am

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Note 332 – The posessive pronoun “theirs” has no apostrophe « My writing challenge - March 27, 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 438 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 71,523 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 438 other followers

%d bloggers like this: