Advertisements
you're reading...
Words

Note 329 – The controversy about the word irregardless


Irregardless - Raleigh, NC

Irregardless - Raleigh, NC (Photo credit: hyku)

When I saw the word irregardless written in The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White, I was drawn to what it said beside it, which was “it should be regardless”. They explain that people have a desire to add in a prefix to make a word negative; however, by adding ‘ir-‘ to regardless, it leaves it with a double negative meaning. Words where it is safe to do this are irrespective and irresponsible as they don’t have a negative suffix at the end.

Although the origin of the word is uncertain, Wikipedia say that “irregardless is an informal term commonly used in place of regardless or irrespective which has caused controversy since it first appeared in the early twentieth century”.

Even though the word irregardless has now been added to some dictionaries, namely Merriam-Webster, American Heritage Dictionaries and Oxford English Dictionaries, it is a non-standard word which should be used with caution, explain Quick and Dirty Tips.com (Grammar Girl). In their article called ‘Irregardless Versus Regardless’ they also say how language experts believe irregardless has been formed from the words regardless and irrespective.

So, do you write regardless or irregardless?

Until tomorrow…

Sandra
www.sandramadeira.com

Photo credit: hyku Flickr

Advertisements

About Sandra Madeira

I am a full-time working mum with a passion for writing and inspiring others. Please let me know what you think of my blog - constructive comments welcome. Have a great day Sandra Freelance Writer www.sandramadeira.com

Discussion

6 thoughts on “Note 329 – The controversy about the word irregardless

  1. Sandra,

    I cringe when educated, well-positioned people use the non-word irregardless. It is a literary bastard hybrid of regardless and irrespective. When it is used, it tells me that the speaker or writer isn’t as smart as he or she thinks.

    All the best,

    Bruce

    Posted by Bruce Stambaugh | March 24, 2012, 10:51 pm
  2. To me an even better reason for not writing “irregardless” is that it would make me sound ignorant–that is, if I used it!.
    I don’t really agree with dictionaries that bend too quickly in the direction of accepting colloquialism as standard
    English.

    Posted by Bill99 (@Bill99) | March 24, 2012, 10:52 pm
  3. I don’t agree with the use of the word but since majority rules, the dictionary accepts it as a word. they have a majority use rule where if it is found in a certain amount of written text it is considered a word. Can you remember back when “ain’t” was NOT a word.

    Posted by MercXue | March 24, 2012, 11:30 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisements

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 432 other followers

Blog Stats

  • 146,841 hits
%d bloggers like this: